Legal Opinion

Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1922PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The legal status of an irrigation district has been brought in question in this controversy. An irrigation district organized under the Irrigation District Law of this state is a municipal corporation, its. property public property, and its officers public officers, elected by the legal voters of the irrigation district, with duties and powers fixed and limited by the law of their creation. Such a district “is cheated for a public purpose and it rests in the discretion of the legislature when to create it and with what powers to endow it.” Fallbrook Irrigation Dist. v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Scott v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1908

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sunshine Dairy v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Gouge v. DavidOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Shasta View Irrigation District v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API