Legal Opinion

Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. Peiper

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1999No. 23912PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment and entering foreclosure of assessment liens in favor of the Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Company (ASCC), pursuant to Chapter 22, Title 42 of the Idaho Code. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Facts

In 1969, George and LaVaudis Peiper (the Peipers) purchased agricultural property in Bingham County. The Peiper property is located within the ASCC irrigation system, and the Peipers’ predecessor was a stockholder of the ASCC. The ASCC is an operating company created under the Carey…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Ada County Highway District v. Total Success Investment, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Chavez v. BarrusIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Vanderford Co., Inc. v. KnudsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Friends of Minidoka v. Jerome CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API