Legal Opinion
Dalles Irrigation District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 2, 2010No. 05-1042CPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
A post-trial judgment was issued in plaintiffs favor in this contract ease involving rates for supply of reserved power from hydroelectric units at The Dalles Dam on the Columbia River to an irrigation district in Oregon. See Dalles Irrigation Dist. v. United States, 88 Fed.Cl. 601 (2009) (“Dalles III ”). As allowed by that judgment, plaintiff (“the District”) has filed a Bill of Costs; in addition, it has moved for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Overall, the District seeks…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Graves ex rel. Estate of Graves v. Secretary of the Dept. of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Dewey v. Volkswagen of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- United Partition Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Infinite Information Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.