Alde, S.A. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, a Dominican Republic corporation, seeks compensation for damage and loss of income resulting from the seizure of plaintiffs aircraft by the U.S. Customs Service. Plaintiff claims that an implied-in-fact bailment contract was created when the aircraft was seized or that the seizure of the aircraft constituted a taking without just compensation. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
Although the parties disagree as to the legal significance of the underlying facts, the substance of the facts…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kam-Almez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- City of Cincinnati v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Gahagan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Rosner v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- Kam-Almaz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.