Legal Opinion

Alde, S.A. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 24, 1993No. 91-1382CPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, a Dominican Republic corporation, seeks compensation for damage and loss of income resulting from the seizure of plaintiffs aircraft by the U.S. Customs Service. Plaintiff claims that an implied-in-fact bailment contract was created when the aircraft was seized or that the seizure of the aircraft constituted a taking without just compensation. Argument is deemed unnecessary.

FACTS

Although the parties disagree as to the legal significance of the underlying facts, the substance of the facts…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kam-Almez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  2. City of Cincinnati v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Gahagan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Rosner v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
  5. Kam-Almaz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API