Kam-Almaz v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER/OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks compensation for losses occasioned by the seizure of his laptop computer by U.S. Customs agents. Plaintiff has failed to offer a valid theory of recovery in this Court, so we GRANT the Government’s Motion to Dismiss.
I. Introduction
According to an editorial in The New York Times of November 15, 2010, during an 18-month period between 2008 and 2010, some 3,000 returning Americans had their laptop computers seized and their contents examined by U.S. Customs. Moreover, as was the case with Mr. Kam Almaz, U.S. Customs agents may freely share the data from…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kam-Almez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Jefferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Refaei v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.