Legal Opinion
Gahagan v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 30, 2006No. 05-1166LPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLAS, Senior Judge.
This takings and illegal exaction claim is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6). After careful consideration of the parties’ written and oral arguments, the court concludes that the plaintiff has not stated a claim for relief and that there is lack of jurisdiction in this court. Defendant’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Roland A. Leblanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Husband v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Ingram v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Keehn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.