Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 1, 1998No. 98-5039PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Among the oldest principles of constitutional law is that a state may not tax the United States. That issue has been settled since 1819, when the Supreme Court held in McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316, 4 L.Ed. 579, that the State of Maryland could not tax the Bank of the United States. That principle, which has been extended to municipalities and subdivisions of states, is simple and absolute: A state or local governmental body may not tax a federal entity in the absence of congressional consent. See United States v. County of Allegheny, 322 U.S. 174, 177,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. William O. Schism and Robert Reinlie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Township of Saddle Brook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. William M. Hanlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Demes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API