City of Cincinnati v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Among the oldest principles of constitutional law is that a state may not tax the United States. That issue has been settled since 1819, when the Supreme Court held in McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316, 4 L.Ed. 579, that the State of Maryland could not tax the Bank of the United States. That principle, which has been extended to municipalities and subdivisions of states, is simple and absolute: A state or local governmental body may not tax a federal entity in the absence of congressional consent. See United States v. County of Allegheny, 322 U.S. 174, 177,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- William O. Schism and Robert Reinlie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Township of Saddle Brook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- William M. Hanlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Demes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.