Legal Opinion
Sposato v. Sposato
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 1997No. Civil 970067PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Robin Sposato appeals from the district court’s order allowing grandparent visitation in the State of New York under NDCC § 14-09-05.1. Determining the issue is moot, we dismiss the appeal.
[¶ 2] Robin and Thomas Sposato were divorced in 1994, with Robin receiving custody of their two daughters, Elizabeth, born June 18,1988, and Mary, bom September 23,1989. Thomas is currently allowed eight hours of supervised visitation every two weeks. The court required supervised visitation because, during the divorce proceeding, it had found Thomas had committed emotional and sexual…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bland v. Commission on Medical CompetencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Gosbee v. BendishNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Sprynczynatyk v. MillsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Bies v. ObregonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gregory v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Guardianship & Conservatorship of D.M.O. v. M.O.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Prairie at St. John's v. W.D.O.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.