State Ex Rel. Sprynczynatyk v. Mills
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
William R. Mills, Betty L. Mills, Dakota-ville, Inc., and River Woods West, Inc. (Mills) appeal from a partial summary judgment in the State’s declaratory judgment action to determine the parties’ interests in certain land1 between the ordinary high watermark and the ordinary low watermark (the “shore zone”) of the Missouri River. We reverse.
Mills owns the land above the ordinary high watermark of the shore zone. The State brought this declaratory judgment action against Mills, seeking a determination that the State’s title to the shore zone extends to the ordinary high…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Matter of Estate of PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Lawrence v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Botner v. BotnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- North Shore, Inc. v. WakefieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.