Guardianship & Conservatorship of D.M.O. v. M.O.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] E.O. appeals from district court orders, which denied her petition to remove M.O. and J.O. as guardians for their mother, D.M.O., and to appoint herself as guardian, denied E.O.’s motion to require D.M.O.’s trustee to reconvey D.M.O.’s house to D.M.O.’s estate, and failed to award E.O. additional attorney’s fees. We dismiss as moot all issues relating to D.M.O.’s guardianship and conservatorship and affirm the order denying E.O. additional attorney’s fees.
I
[¶ 2] This appeal arises from proceedings on remand in In the Matter of Guardianship and Conservatorship of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Estate of HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Matter of Estate of RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Gratech Co., Ltd. v. Wold Engineering, PCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Ashley Education Ass'n v. Ashley Public School District, No. 9North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- DeCoteau v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hager v. City of Devils LakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Walstad v. WalstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- C.V. v. Guardian & Protective Services, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MartinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.