Legal Opinion

Guardianship & Conservatorship of D.M.O. v. M.O.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2008No. 20060280PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] E.O. appeals from district court orders, which denied her petition to remove M.O. and J.O. as guardians for their mother, D.M.O., and to appoint herself as guardian, denied E.O.’s motion to require D.M.O.’s trustee to reconvey D.M.O.’s house to D.M.O.’s estate, and failed to award E.O. additional attorney’s fees. We dismiss as moot all issues relating to D.M.O.’s guardianship and conservatorship and affirm the order denying E.O. additional attorney’s fees.

I

[¶ 2] This appeal arises from proceedings on remand in In the Matter of Guardianship and Conservatorship of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Matter of Estate of RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Gratech Co., Ltd. v. Wold Engineering, PCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ashley Education Ass'n v. Ashley Public School District, No. 9North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. DeCoteau v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hager v. City of Devils LakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Walstad v. WalstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. C.V. v. Guardian & Protective Services, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. MartinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API