Legal Opinion

State v. Hansen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2006No. 20050387PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] The State of North Dakota- appealed from a conviction entered upon Brent Hansen’s guilty plea to three drug offenses after the district court ruled the provisions for random drug testing as a condition of bail in N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-46 were unconstitutional. We conclude the State’s appeal is moot. We dismiss the appeal but we exercise our supervisory jurisdiction to vacate the district court’s ruling on the constitutionality of N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-46.

I

[¶ 2] The State charged Hansen with possession of methamphetamine in violation of N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(6), a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Forum Publishing Co. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Riemers v. OmdahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hart v. ByeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Traynor v. LeclercNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ashley Education Ass'n v. Ashley Public School District, No. 9North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Teigen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. White v. Altru Health SystemNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. SkarsgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Sorenson v. FeltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API