Legal Opinion

Bies v. Obregon

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1997No. Civil 950341PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAKING, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals from judgments 1 holding that Raymond Obregon’s child support obligation expired at the end of October 1983 and that his obligation to pay Carol Ann Bies spousal support expired upon her remarriage in June 1990, but that he is still liable for accrued spousal support ar-rearages totaling $21,784. The trial court also stated that, because an obligation to pay child support was no longer combined with an obligation to pay spousal support, the State’s “authority” to assist the district court in recovering the spousal support alone “ceased” when Obregon…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. QuistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Medical Arts Clinic, P.C. v. Franciscan Initiatives, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. DalmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Botner v. BotnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. HagertyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Sprunk v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Opp v. Ward County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Nord v. HerrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Goodman v. E.T.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API