Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Peterson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 1997No. Civil 960203PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
[¶ 1] Kent and Tracy Peterson appealed from an order continuing and expanding visitation rights for James and Elsie Peterson, the paternal grandparents of Kent and Tracy’s son, Brett. We conclude the visitation order is clearly erroneous, and we remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
[¶ 2] Kent and Tracy were married in June 1990, and Brett was born on October 1,1992. Kent and Tracy developed marital conflicts and, for more than a year, Kent lived and farmed with his parents on their farm in Ransom County, while Tracy and Brett lived about 25 miles away…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hoff v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Stoppler v. StopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Gregory v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- McCabe v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Billey v. North Dakota Stockmen's Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.