Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Miranda
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided September 29, 2014No. 2:11-cv-01919-LRH-PALPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Before the court is defendants the Clark County School District (“CCSD”), Filiber-to Arroyo (“Arroyo”), Brian Nebeker (“Nebeker”), Loren Johnson (“Johnson”), and Armando Quintanilla’s (“Quintanilla”) (collectively “moving defendants”) motion for reconsideration of the court’s January 10, 2014 order denying in-part and granting in-part their motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 2541). Doc. # 257. Plaintiffs Linda and Francis Peterson (“the Petersons”) filed an opposition (Doc. # 261) to which moving defendants replied (Doc. # 265).
I. Facts and Procedural…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Thomas Anderson v. Charles Warner County of Mendocino County of Mendocino Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- James Gillette v. Duane Delmore, and City of EugeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Freeman Expositions, LLC v. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
- Dey-Sarkar v. AdesinaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Dickson v. Walmart, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- Gardner v. Sage Ridge SchoolDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Gary Wayne Francis Gumataotao v. David Jeffrey Highsmith, Does I and II, Insurance companies, and Government of GuamSuperior Court of Guam · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.