Legal Opinion

Harrah v. Home Furniture, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1950No. 3593PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

Home Furniture, Incorporated, recovered a judgment against John Harrah, pursuant to verdict of a jury, for $820.75 as a balance due for merchandise ordered by and delivered to Gloria Harrah, the defendant’s wife, and charged to Harrah’s account. He has appealed from the judgment and order denying new trial. The main question involved is that of the creation by Harrah of an ostensible agency in his wife. No question is raised as to the delivery of the merchandise or its reasonable value.

Plaintiff’s book accounts admitted in evidence showed an account against John…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aga v. HarbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Harrison v. LegoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Quinn v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wilcox v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  5. Graves v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrah v. Specialty Shops, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Curtis v. Radio Representatives, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1988
  3. Digital Ally, Inc. v. Z³ Technology, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
  4. Benjamin L. Ortiz Co. v. Hotel Flamingo, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API