Daniels v. Swofford
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
At issue is whether the trial court has subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim or whether the Industrial Commission has exclusive jurisdiction. We conclude that the Workers’ Compensation Act precludes plaintiff from seeking recovery from the corporate employer. Plaintiff, however, does have the right to bring a tort action against the assaultive coemployee. Summary judgment in favor of that defendant was improperly granted.
We must first determine whether plaintiff has the right to proceed under the Workers’ Compensation Act. It is well settled that to maintain an…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- National Can Corp. v. JovanovichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ortiz Pérez v. Fondo del Seguro del EstadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Andrews v. PetersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.