Legal Opinion

Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1994No. 41S01-9406-CV-567PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Anthony Perry says that the managers of Stitzer Buick decided to drive him out of his job as a salesman because he was black. Stitzer Buick argues that it cannot be sued for having done so. We hold otherwise.

I. Perry’s Experience at Stitzer

Treat customers “equally” and “politely.” That was Gordon Heinriech’s advice to Anthony Perry in August 1987 when he selected him to become one of Stitzer Buick’s new trainees. Perry soon learned, however, that what was preached on Stitzer’s showroom floor was not practiced by its managers. While eight of Stitzer’s ten trainees quit…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Anand Prakash v. American UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Evans v. Yankeetown Dock Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Letson v. LowmasterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Bryan v. Utah InternationalUtah Supreme Court · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Robert and Wana McCreary v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Sims v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. R.L. Turner Corp. v. Town of BrownsburgIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Branham v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API