Legal Opinion
Lovette v. Lloyd
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 6, 1953No. 742PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
73 S.E.2d 886 (1953)
236 N.C. 663
LOVETTE
v.
LLOYD et al.
No. 742.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
January 6, 1953.
Albert W. Kennon, Durham, for plaintiff-appellant.
Victor S. Bryant, Ralph N. Strayhorn, Durham, and Ruark, Ruark & Moore, Raleigh, for original defendants, G. D. Lloyd and M. G. Copelan, individually and trading as Lloyd & Copelan Plumbing Company, appellees.
Fuller, Reade, Umstead & Fuller, Durham, for additional defendants, Claiborne Byrd and F. L. Byrd, copartners, trading as Consolidated Painters, and U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., appellants.
ERVIN, Justice.
This case is governed by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Mickel v. New England Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Essick v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Doyle v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Glass v. Stahl Specialty CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Arctic Structures, Inc. v. WedmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.