Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bernstein

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 8, 2001No. 8, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action against Jack A. Bernstein (Respondent), alleging violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct and the Business Occupations and Professions Article. The Commission charged Respondent with violating Rules 1.5 (Fees),1 1.15 (Safekeeping prop*211erty),2 8.1 (Bar admission and disciplinary matters),3 8.4 (Misconduct),4 16-604 (Trust account-Required deposits),5 16-606 *212(Name and designation of account),6 16-607 (Commingling of funds),7 and 16-609 (Prohibited transactions).8…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cherry-MahoiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DiCiccoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaignanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API