Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. DiCicco

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 18, 2002No. Misc. AG No. 40, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709(a), 1 Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission (“Petitioner”), and at the direction of the Review Board, filed a petition with this Court initiating disciplinary proceedings against Robert A. DiCicco, Esquire (“Respondent”), a member of the Maryland Bar since November 1964. In the petition, Bar Counsel alleged violations of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”) 1.15 (safekeeping property) and 8.4 (misconduct); Maryland Rules 16-607 (commingling of funds) and 16-609 (prohibited transactions); and Maryland Code (1989, 2000 RepLVol.,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API