In Re Wilson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
WILENTZ, C. J.
In this case, respondent knowingly used his clients’ money as if it were his own. We hold that disbarment is the only appropriate discipline. We also use this occasion to state that generally all such cases shall result in disbarment. We foresee no significant exceptions to this rule and expect the result to be almost invariable.
Of the eight complaints filed against respondent with District Ethics Committee VIII (Middlesex County), two involved misappropriation. In one, respondent failed for almost two years to turn over $23,000—the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re GavelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- In Re GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- In Re BeckmannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- In re HawkinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1913
- In re HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by413 opinions
- Washington Legal Foundation v. Massachusetts Bar FoundationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Knight v. City of MargateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
408 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.