Legal Opinion

Street v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 2, 1915No. Nos. 19,298—(172)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in the district court for Goodhue county to recover $3,000 for personal injury received while alighting from defendant’s train. The case was tried before Johnson, J., who when plaintiff rested denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the action, and a jury which returned a verdict for $933.33. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Dibell, C.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries; verdict for the plaintiff; defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment or for a new trial.

1. This case was here before and is reported, in 124 Minn. 517, 145 N. W. 746. The general facts explanatory of the case may be found there. A decision made upon a former appeal is the law of the case. Orr v. Sutton, 127 Minn. 37, 148 N. W. 1066, and cases cited; and evidence held sufficient to sustain a verdict on a first appeal is sufficient on a second appeal. Webber v. Axtell, 110 Minn. 52, 124 N. W. 453, 1…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Orr v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Street v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Webber v. AxtellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Booren v. McWilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Ikenberry v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Goldman v. ChristySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. McCarty v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. O. C. Hanson & Sons v. BeaulieuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API