Goldman v. Christy

Lees, C.

This is a second appeal, the decision in the first being reported in 155 Minn. 91, 192 N. W. 360, where the facts are fully stated. No new facts were established at the second trial, hence the casé is controlled by the former decision unless it is overruled.

The correctness of the decision is questioned, it being contended by plaintiff’s counsel that, if effect' be given to the rule of law announced in the opinion, the obligation of the contract between the plaintiff and the Minneapolis Copper Company will be impaired. It is argued that, when the contract was made, the law gave plain-'…