Legal Opinion

Booren v. McWilliams

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1916PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Towner County, A. G. Burr, Special ■Judge. From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. When an express promise of marriage is pleaded, as in this case, the promise or contract cannot be shown, inferred, or implied from acts and ■conduct.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Towner County, A. G. Burr, Special ■Judge. From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. When an express promise of marriage is pleaded, as in this case, the promise or contract cannot be shown, inferred, or implied from acts and ■conduct. Eeynolds v. Curry, 81 Kan. 443, 105 Pac. 437; Bleiler v. Koons, 132 Pa. 101, 19 Atl. 140. Where conduct of parties is relied upon as establishing a promise, ■evidence is restricted and limited to open, visible, or public conduct of the parties toward each other. Wrynn…

1Opinion of the Court

Fisk, Ch. J.

Action to recover damages for breach of promise of marriage aggravated by seduction. Plaintiff had judgment in the court below for $10,000, and costs. Defendant appeals both from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The cause was here on a former appeal, and for a general statement of the facts, see opinion in 26 N. D. 558, 145 N. W. 410, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 388.

Appellant relies upon the specifications urged on his motion for a new trial in the district court. These are four in number as follows:

“1. Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict.
“2.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Liese v. MeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Bennett v. BeamMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Geiger v. PayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Lanigan v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Marshall v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stetson v. Investors Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Lake v. NeubauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Kern v. Art Schimkat Construction Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Julson v. Loyal Order of Moose Number 822North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Helgeson v. LockenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API