Webber v. Axtell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Martin county to quiet plaintiff’s title to certain land and to recover the possession thereof. The case was tried before Quinn, J., who directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, defendants James First and Lothar Harms appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was before us on a former appeal, and is reported in 94 Minn. 375, 102 N. W. 915, 6 L. R. A. (N. S.) 194, where the facts are fully stated. After the cause was remanded, defendant applied for and obtained a second trial. The former trial was had before the court without a jury, and came here for review upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law. The second trial was before a jury, and at the conclusion of the trial a verdict was directed for plaintiff. Judgment was subsequently entered, and defendant appealed.
The questions raised on this appeal, with the exception of the one…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Webber v. AxtellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baxter v. BrandenburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Behr v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Street v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Maki v. St. Luke's Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914