Orr v. Sutton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county by Charles N. Orr, Herman F. Stark, Charles E. Collett, copartners as Orr, Stark & Collett, and Charles J. Spratt against William Sutton, Lyman Sutton, William Sauntry and his wife, Russell M. Bennett, Edmund J. Longyear, Louis E. Torinus and all other persons claiming any right, title, estate, interest or lien in the real estate described. The facts are set forth in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county by Charles N. Orr, Herman F. Stark, Charles E. Collett, copartners as Orr, Stark & Collett, and Charles J. Spratt against William Sutton, Lyman Sutton, William Sauntry and his wife, Russell M. Bennett, Edmund J. Longyear, Louis E. Torinus and all other persons claiming any right, title, estate, interest or lien in the real estate described. The facts are set forth in the opinion. The case was tried before Eesler, L, who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiffs, removing the cloud on their title and interest in the land by the…
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Action to quiet' title. William Sauntrj owned an undivided half of valuable mining lands in St. Louis county, tbis state, which he mortgaged to secure the sum of $30,000. He defaulted and the mortgage was duly foreclosed by advertisement. The year for redemption expired on September 20, 1911. The rights acquired by the purchaser at the sale were on the last named date held by Louis E. Torinus, the sheriff’s certificate having been duly assigned to him. The mortgagor was insolvent, and unsatisfied judgments existed against him. Transcripts of the following judgments were docketed in St. Louis…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Kortright v. . CadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Case v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Leeds v. LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Adams County v. B. & M. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Bolton v. HeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Seitz v. Union Brass & Metal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Engenmoen v. LutroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Hanson v. WoolstonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Fuller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Grant v. BibbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.