Ikenberry v. New York Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal reported in 127 Minn. 215,149 N. W. 292, the ease was tried before Fish, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $6,320.83. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
This action was brought to recover on a life insurance policy, alleged to have been issued by defendant upon the life of Mary E. Cook. Defendant denied the insurance contract, and all material allegations of the complaint were thus put in issue. Plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appealed from an order-denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
There was a former trial of the action as a result of which a prior appeal was presented to this court and is reported in 127 Minn. 215, 149 N. W. 292. That was an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion, after verdict for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Ikenberry v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Marshall v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Hibbs v. MarpeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Palmer v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sawyer v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Lundgren v. Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Halstead v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920