Legal Opinion

Smith v. Albrecht

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1985No. 14298PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

This appeal is from a declaratory judgment action initiated pursuant to SDCL ch. 21-24 by a group of Meade County, South Dakota, residents and property owners (Smith). Smith requested a declaration that a road leading to the various plaintiffs’ properties had been dedicated and accepted for use as a public road; or in the alternative, that a prescriptive easement over the defendants’ (Albrecht) property had arisen in favor of Smith. The trial court declared that a public road existed and that there was no prescriptive easement. We reverse.

The disputed road is approximately…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Haley v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Miller v. ScholtenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Brusseau v. McBrideSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Weitzel v. FelkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. TinagliaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Smith v. SponheimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Production Credit Ass'n of the Midlands v. WynneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Titus v. ChapmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Thieman v. BohmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API