Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sponheim

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1987No. 15310PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action under SDCL ch. 21-24 by a group of Meade County, South Dakota residents and property owners (Smith/ap-pellees). Smith and others requested a declaration that a road leading to their various properties had been dedicated and accepted for use as a public road, or, in the alternative, for a prescriptive easement over the property of defendants (formerly Albrecht, now Sponheim/appellants). The trial court entered a judgment in July 1983, which declared that a public road existed and that no prescriptive easement existed.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. ShewmakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Mason v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. First Church of Christ v. RevellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Cole v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Larson v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R'y. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Century 21 Associated Realty v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Nielsen v. McCabeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. O'CONNOR v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hilbrands v. HilbrandsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Maryhouse, Inc. v. HamiltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API