Legal Opinion

Titus v. Chapman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Stacey and Marilyn Titus filed suit against Sandra Chapman to determine the boundary between their adjoining lots located in Pennington County, South Dakota. Both parties agreed on the proper legal boundary line, but differed as to its location based on competing surveys.. Following a hearing on opposing motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted Tituses’ motion. The trial court also held Chapman did not establish a claim of adverse possession. The trial court did not grant Chapman’s motion to join necessary parties. Chapman appeals all three…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City of Colton v. SchwebachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Morgan v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Weitzel v. Sioux Valley Heart PartnersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hendrix v. SchulteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. A-G-E Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. North Star Mutual Insurance v. KorzanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API