Legal Opinion

Thieman v. Bohman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] James and Lynn Thieman (Thie-man) filed suit against Tom and Pam Boh-man (Bohman) seeking a declaration that an alley/road bordering the parties’ property was a public road and seeking to enjoin Bohman from blocking this alley/road. The trial court determined that the alley/road is a dedicated public alley/road and granted Thieman a permanent injunction enjoining Bohman from barricading the alley/road or preventing its use as a public way. Bohman appeals, arguing that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because of the failure to join the City of Winner (City) as an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kroupa v. KroupaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Estate of GaladaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Smith v. AlbrechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Weitzel v. FelkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Bergin v. BistodeauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Titus v. ChapmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bergin v. BistodeauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. One 1995 Silver Jeep Grand Cherokee, Vin 1J4GZ78Y4SC548019South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. J.K. Dean, Inc. v. KSD, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Bittle v. Cam-Colorado, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API