Thieman v. Bohman
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] James and Lynn Thieman (Thie-man) filed suit against Tom and Pam Boh-man (Bohman) seeking a declaration that an alley/road bordering the parties’ property was a public road and seeking to enjoin Bohman from blocking this alley/road. The trial court determined that the alley/road is a dedicated public alley/road and granted Thieman a permanent injunction enjoining Bohman from barricading the alley/road or preventing its use as a public way. Bohman appeals, arguing that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because of the failure to join the City of Winner (City) as an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kroupa v. KroupaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Estate of GaladaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Smith v. AlbrechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Weitzel v. FelkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Bergin v. BistodeauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Titus v. ChapmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Bergin v. BistodeauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. One 1995 Silver Jeep Grand Cherokee, Vin 1J4GZ78Y4SC548019South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- J.K. Dean, Inc. v. KSD, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Bittle v. Cam-Colorado, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.