Legal Opinion
Cleveland v. Tinaglia
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Mark and Kandy Cleveland, brought a declaratory judgment action against J. Dean Tinaglia and Ladonna Tinaglia to determine, among other things, the extent and location of easements over Clevelands’ property. The circuit court determined the existence and width of the easements with reference to the time of their creation. Tinaglias appeal. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Tinaglias own approximately 3,000 acres of land in Fall River County, South Dakota. This property lies south of Highway 18-385 and the Fall River. To travel from Highway 18-385 to their property, Ti-naglias…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cromwell v. HosbrookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Cordell v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of Estate of JetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Century 21 Associated Realty v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Insurance Agents, Inc. v. ZimmermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Moore v. Michelin Tire Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Mitchell v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- New Era Mining Co. v. Dakota Placers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Midzak v. MidzakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- DeHaven v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.