Haley v. City of Rapid City
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Justice.
The trial court entered a judgment that enjoined the city of Rapid City from opening an alley and that decreed that the alley is not a public way. The judgment also enjoined Clifford Nall from utilizing the alley. Both defendants have appealed. We reverse.
James and Ann Haley (respondents) are owners of a residential lot in Block 39, West Boulevard Addition, in the city of Rapid City. An alley borders respondents’ property. This dispute centers around a forty foot section of that alley. In 1975, appellant Nall acquired property abutting the segment of the .alley that had…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Rapid City v. HoogterpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Tinaglia v. IttzesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Larson v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R'y. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Evans v. City of BrookingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Zemple v. ButlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. SponheimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Miller v. ScholtenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Smith v. AlbrechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Giese v. Morton CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Aasland v. County of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.