Legal Opinion

Haley v. City of Rapid City

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1978No. 12373, 12374PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Justice.

The trial court entered a judgment that enjoined the city of Rapid City from opening an alley and that decreed that the alley is not a public way. The judgment also enjoined Clifford Nall from utilizing the alley. Both defendants have appealed. We reverse.

James and Ann Haley (respondents) are owners of a residential lot in Block 39, West Boulevard Addition, in the city of Rapid City. An alley borders respondents’ property. This dispute centers around a forty foot section of that alley. In 1975, appellant Nall acquired property abutting the segment of the .alley that had…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Rapid City v. HoogterpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Tinaglia v. IttzesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Larson v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R'y. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Evans v. City of BrookingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Zemple v. ButlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. SponheimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Miller v. ScholtenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Smith v. AlbrechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Giese v. Morton CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Aasland v. County of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API