Holland v. Kerr
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
As a result of a collision between an automobile driven by defendant Bisek and in which plaintiff was riding, and one driven by defendant Kerr, plaintiff sued both defendants. From a judgment of nonsuit in favor of Bisek and a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of Kerr, plaintiff appeals.
Questions Presented
1. Was there any evidence of willful misconduct, and hence the judgment of nonsuit was improper? 2. Did the court err in refusing instructions based on section 2061, subdivisions 6 and 7, and section 1963, subdivision 5, Code of Civil Procedure, where photographs were admitted in evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Porter v. HofmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Isaac & Rebecca Thomas v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Neumann v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Jackson v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. GoldsmithAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2011
- Milick v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962