Legal Opinion

People v. Goldsmith

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided February 14, 2011No. BR048189PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KUMAR, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

On March 13, 2009, a notice to appear was issued to appellant pursuant to the automated traffic enforcement statutes (Veh. Code, §§ 21455.5-21455.7), alleging she failed to stop at a red signal light located at the intersection of Centinela Avenue and Beach Avenue in the City of Inglewood. Following a court trial wherein photographic evidence obtained from an automated traffic enforcement system (ATES) was admitted, appellant was convicted of failing to stop at a red signal light (Veh. Code, § 21453, subd. (a)).

Appellant presents the following contentions: (1)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. HovarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. BowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. BeckleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. DaughertyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API