Legal Opinion

Milick v. Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1962No. Civ. No. 6740Published

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment ordering removal of certain encroachments placed in a watercourse by each party and denying damages to either.

The Controversy

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that a certain watercourse or ravine bed lies entirely on defendant’s lot; that defendant obstructed the watercourse, causing diversion of water onto plaintiff’s lot to plaintiff’s damage. A second count was pleaded in the form of quiet title, but defendant denied any claim to plaintiff’s lot and no controversy developed with respect thereto on trial. Defendant filed a cross-complaint, alleging that said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gates v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Burke v. ChrostowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Holland v. KerrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API