Milick v. Baker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment ordering removal of certain encroachments placed in a watercourse by each party and denying damages to either.
The Controversy
Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that a certain watercourse or ravine bed lies entirely on defendant’s lot; that defendant obstructed the watercourse, causing diversion of water onto plaintiff’s lot to plaintiff’s damage. A second count was pleaded in the form of quiet title, but defendant denied any claim to plaintiff’s lot and no controversy developed with respect thereto on trial. Defendant filed a cross-complaint, alleging that said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gates v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Burke v. ChrostowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Holland v. KerrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953