Legal Opinion

Porter v. Hofman

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1938No. Sac. 5244PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiffs obtained a judgment in damages for personal injuries to the plaintiff, Mrs. Porter, sustained when the automobile in which she was riding as a guest of the defendant overturned after skidding on wet pavement. The judgment was entered pursuant to the finding of the trial court' that the defendant was guilty of wilful misconduct. The defendant appealed from the judgment.

The only question for determination is whether the evidence supports the finding of wilful misconduct.

Mrs. Hofman and Mrs. Porter were close friends. Mrs. Hofman conducted a business in Ukiah and had occasion to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Turner v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Hawaiian Pineapple Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API