Bollman v. State

OPINION

W. C. DAVIS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for aggravated kidnapping. The jury assessed punishment at 75 years imprisonment. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.

On appeal the appellant asserts two grounds of error, the consideration of which does not require a recitation of the facts. Appellant’s first ground of error contends the court erred by failing to grant his pretrial motion to set aside the indictment.

The indictment reads in part as follows, that appellant did:

“... intentionally and knowingly abduct Colton Lavergne by secreting and holding him in a…