Legal Opinion

Fisher v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 24, 1991No. 05-89-01459-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KINKEADE, Justice.

Ronald Gene Fisher appeals his conviction for securing the execution of a document by deception. After a jury trial, the jury assessed punishment at four years’ confinement, probated for ten years, and a $5000 fine. In six points of error, Fisher argues that (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction, (2) the State erroneously charged him with deception rather than forgery, (3) the indictment failed to provide sufficient notice of the offense charged, and (4) the prosecution committed reversible error by commenting on his refusal to call a witness.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Murchison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  2. Johnson v. NedeffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Webb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  4. Briones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  5. State v. Campbell, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API