Legal Opinion
State v. Sandoval
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided December 17, 1992No. 13-91-505-CR, 13-91-521-CRPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEERDEN, Justice.
Ruben Sandoval was charged by indictment and information with two incidents of barratry. 1 Sandoval filed motions to dismiss these charging instruments, and the trial court granted them. The State appeals. See Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 44.01(a)(1) (Vernon Supp.1992). We affirm the trial court’s orders.
At a hearing, Sandoval presented evidence and argument on some of the grounds contained in his motions. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court orally found that the charging instruments should be dismissed on several grounds. The trial court then entered…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. MaysCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- State v. HoganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Webb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Mauricio Rodriguez Celis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.