May v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for capital murder. The punishment is death.
The appellant asserts twenty-nine grounds of error. Since he complains that the evidence is insufficient to corroborate accomplice witness testimony, a detailed recitation of the facts is necessary.
Appellant was indicted for the murder of his stepfather, Roy Melton Ayotte. It was alleged that the appellant, for remuneration and the promise of remuneration, hired Arthur Smith to kill Ayotte. Ayotte had been shot once; his body was found outside the Acme Refrigeration Company located at 3111 Polk…
2Cases cited96 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Fairow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Montoya v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- DeVaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.