Legal Opinion
Shiffrin v. I.V. Services of America, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 4, 1999No. AC 17390PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*131 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Mark A. Shiffrin, the commissioner of consumer protection (commissioner), served an investigative demand on the defendant I.V. Services of America, Inc., pursuant to General Statutes § 42-1 lOd (c).1 The defendant appeals from an order of the trial court denying its motion for a protective order in response to the investigative demand.
The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied its motion for a protective order because it (1) did not apply properly the pharmacist-customer privilege of General Statutes § 20-626, (2) failed to protect *132the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Jennifer W.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Echavarria v. Fadner, No. Cv00 0180714 S (Mar. 30, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Hopper v. Hemphill, No. Cv 99-0171709 S (May 10, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000