Legal Opinion
Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IV
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 19, 1994No. 14725PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the Connecticut constitution guarantees a right to a jury trial for actions brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA). General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.1 We conclude that the state *151constitution does not require a jury trial for CUTPA claims.2
The relevant facts are as follows. The plaintiff, Associated Investment Company Limited Partnership, brought an action against the defendants, Williams Associates IV, Walter J. Lewis, Jr., Norman J. Voog and Victor J. Buselli (Williams Associates), to collect on a promissory note…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.