Legal Opinion

Hopper v. Hemphill, No. Cv 99-0171709 S (May 10, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 10, 2000No. CV 99-0171709 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The plaintiff Paul F. Hopper d/b/a Paul F. Hopper Associates (Hopper) brings the present action against the defendants E. Jane Hemphill and People's Bank seeking to foreclose a mechanic's lien. Hemphill filed an answer with special defenses and counterclaims against Hopper. Hemphill alleges in her counterclaim negligence (count one), breach of contract (count two), fraudulent misrepresentation (count three) and violation of General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., the Connecticut Unfair Trade…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Hartford Electric Supply Co. v. Allen-Bradley Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Citino v. Redevelopment AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API