Legal Opinion

Vroman v. City of Soldotna

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 2005No. S-11387PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Greg Vroman was fired from his job with the Soldotna Police Department. He now seeks to vacate an arbitration decision affirming his termination, arguing that the City of Soldotna did not properly select its arbitrator. Because the de facto officer doctrine conferred validity on the arbitration even if the arbitrator had not been properly selected, we affirm the decision of the superi- or court.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Greg Vroman was a police officer with the Soldotna Police Department. In September 1999 he shot a lynx out of season and failed to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ryder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Nguyen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maines v. Kenworth Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Maines v. Kenworth Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. N.C. State Conf. of NAACP v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  4. NC NAACP v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  5. Opinion No. (2011), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API