Legal Opinion
Ryder v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 12, 1995No. 94-431PublishedCited by 367 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Coast Guard, challenges his conviction by a court-martial. His conviction was affirmed first by the Coast Guard Court of Military Review, and then by the United States Court of Military Appeals. The latter court agreed with petitioner that the two civilian judges who served on the Court of Military Review had not been appointed in accordance with the dictates of the Appointments Clause, U. S. Const., Art. II, § 2, cl. 2, but nonetheless held that the actions of those judges were valid de facto. We hold that the judges’ actions were not valid…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by367 opinions
- Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Hamdan v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Carr v. SaulSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- O'Brien v. DuboisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
362 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.