Legal Opinion
Nguyen v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 9, 2003No. 01-10873PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
These cases present the question whether a panel of the Court of Appeals consisting of two Article III judges and one Article IV judge had the authority to decide petitioners’ appeals. We conclude it did not, and we therefore vacate the judgments of the Court of Appeals.
Petitioners are residents of the island of Guam, which has been a possession of the United States since the end of the Spanish-American War.1 The Navy administered the island, except for the period of Japanese occupation during World War II, until Congress established Guam as an unincorporated Territory with the passage of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ryder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Coleman v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Hamdan v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Rivera v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. United States District Court for Northern Mariana IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Pablo Bastidas v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.