Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided May 27, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Senator Rice:

This office has received your request for an Official Opinion of the Attorney General in which you ask the following questions:

1. May a person perform official duties of a state agency with compensation paid by a private person or entity?

2. If the answer to Question 1 is "yes," is the state agency responsible for the acts and omissions of such a person?

3. If the answer to Question No. 1 is "yes," is such a person an "employee" for purposes of the Governmental Tort Claims Act?

4. If the answer to Question No. 1 is "yes," may such a person command state employees of the agency…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ryder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Nguyen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Cox v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Stearns, Mayor v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API