Legal Opinion
Martin v. Frank
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 31, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-570 MMSPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Reginald Martin (“Martin”) and Sylvester Pennick (“Pennick”), employees of the United States Postal Service, brought an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), alleging adverse treatment by their supervisors and the Postal Service. Specifically, they allege deprivation of employment opportunities because of their race and color and in reprisal for pursuit of civil rights actions through both collective bargaining agreement procedures and the Equal Employment Office.
Through…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Susan Waltman v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Dr. Julia Elizabeth Berry v. The Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Angeline OSTAPOWICZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHNSON BRONZE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Martin v. Kroger Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- Parker v. State of Del., Dept. of Public SafetyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- Lewis v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Perryman v. WestDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
- Gallentine v. Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.