Legal Opinion
Martin v. Kroger Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 15, 1999No. Civ.A. H-98-2120PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendants The Kroger Co. (“Kroger”) and Charles Hembree’s (“Hembree”) Motion for Summary Judgment (# 18). Kroger and Hem-bree seek summary judgment on Plaintiff Elaine Martin’s (“Martin”) claims of racial and sexual discrimination and retaliation under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (“TCHRA”) as well as tortious interference with existing and prospective business relations. Having reviewed the pending motion, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the court is of…
2Cases cited252 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Robertson v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Winters v. Chubb & Son, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Herbert v. City of Forest HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Williams v. Vought, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.